QLU-11由湖南理工学院开发，由中国北方工业公司制造，中国北方工业公司是中国国有武器制造商，也是世界上最大的国防承包商之一。虽然QLU-11仅供中国军方使用，但也有一种出口型号可供国际买家使用，命名为LG5。LG5 可使用北约标准 40x53mm 榴弹，这意味着它可以发射外国军队使用的任何数量的弹药，包括他们自己的可编程空爆弹。
中国为何使用这种大型狙击榴弹发射器？
外国网友评论内容：
Tripod
1天前
IMHO, it does fullfil several roles passably well - as mentioned in the video - with a relatively simple, low-cost solution. It is direct fire - no waiting for the strike to come in - and holds any vehicle less armored than an IFV at risk, can punch through walls and so on.
在我看来，正如视频中提到的那样，它以相对简单、低成本的解决方案很好地完成了几项任务。它可以直接开火--无需等待攻击的到来--并能使任何装甲低于 IFV 的车辆处于危险之中，还能穿墙等等。
It seems to provide a lot of applications that a squad might encounter without that squad needing additional support from other elements. And grunts can get very creative in the thick of things, having more options to solve current local problems by direct intervention sure is not going to hurt the squads effectiveness.
它似乎能提供一个小队可能遇到的大量应用，而不需要其他小队的额外支持。而步兵在战场上也能发挥出巨大的创造力，有了更多的选择，可以通过直接干预来解决当前的局部问题，这肯定不会影响小队的战斗力。
Maxwell
1天前
Sniper and grenade launcher dont go in the same sentenceThe soldier used the automatic grenade launcher to supress the sniper.
狙击手和榴弹发射器不能混为一谈，士兵用自动榴弹发射器压制狙击手。
GMATveteran
9小时前
This weapon could enable any average infantryman to perform the function of a good-enough "sniper", without going through months of sniper school training, & who knows how many hours (& rounds) expended for marksmanship practice. With a long-range, direct fire grenade launcher like this, one could "snipe" an enemy without the need to achieve pinpoint accuracy.
这种武器可以让任何一名普通步兵履行一名合格 "狙击手 "的职能，而无需经过数月的狙击手学校培训，也不知道要花费多少时间（和子弹）进行射击训练。有了这样的远程直射榴弹发射器，就可以 "狙杀 "敌人，而无需做到精确无误。
The sights partially assist with the aim, & the explosive round compensates for inaccuracy by virtue of the fact that it's an area-of-effect munition. It can't replace real snipers in scenarios where one needs to avoid collateral damage, but having such a system in a unit certainly enhances operational flexibility.
瞄准镜可以部分地辅助瞄准，而爆炸弹则可以通过它是一种效应区弹药这一事实来补偿不准确性。在需要避免附带伤害的情况下，它无法取代真正的狙击手，但在部队中配备这种系统无疑会提高作战灵活性。
Bobafett
2小时前
in most sniper movies ,one just waiting another show up behind the wall,when you got this ,you don't need to wait anymore
在大多数狙击电影中，一个人只是在等待另一个人在墙后出现，当你有了这个，你就不需要再等待了。
AirshipNorway
1天前
All jokes aside this seems like it can be an extremely effective weapons system. Especially against light armored vehicles. Also would make a great anti material weapon. If I were building an army I could see this being in it.
玩笑归玩笑，这似乎是一种非常有效的武器系统。尤其是对付轻型装甲车辆。此外，它还是一种很好的反物质武器。如果我正在组建一支军队，我可以看到它的身影。
Peters
2小时前
if you ever played Battlefield spamming with grenades launchers, you will know this is the most practical weapon
如果你玩过《战地》中的榴弹发射器，你就会知道这是最实用的武器。
Gopnik
1天前
being able to place an accurate grenade at 1km sounds pretty attractive, especially in a fortified position
能在 1 公里范围内准确投放手榴弹听起来很有吸引力，尤其是在坚固的阵地上！
GO0SE
6小时前
I don't know about the western media, but in Chinese media a lot of people say : "Americans create the idea, we accomplish it"
我不知道西方媒体是怎么说的，但在中国媒体上，很多人都说："美国人创造了理念，我们完成了它"。
Nerdlingeeksly
1天前
This could actually be an extremely effective and economical anti-personnel weapon if done correctly, The increased accuracy of a marksman firing an explosive from a makeshift sniper rifle might lead to a reduction in the need to manufacture artillery shells while maintaining or increasing the kill/wound ratio that anti-personel artillery does.
如果使用得当，这实际上可以成为一种极其有效和经济的杀伤武器。神枪手使用临时狙击步枪发射炸药，其精确度的提高可能会减少对炮弹制造的需求，同时保持或提高杀伤火炮的杀伤率。
You can even use this to take out high-profile targets or ammo dumps with high accuracy and have the element of surprise since you wouldn't have as large of a force firing a barrage of mortars at the enemy, you could have 1 or 2 sneak up to or behind enemy lines with this and they could flea after firing more effectively since .
你甚至可以用它来以高精确度摧毁引人注目的目标或弹药库，而且还能出其不意，因为你不会有那么多兵力向敌人发射迫击炮弹，你可以让一两个人用它悄悄接近或躲在敌后，他们可以在开火后更有效地逃跑。
Showtime
1天前
i don’t even care if it’s not practical it’s so cool
我甚至不在乎它是否实用，它太酷了！
Rkiewicz
1天前
I see it having potential. It's basically a small portable anti-light vehicle and material weapon. It can penetrate up to 70-75mm of steel. So if your squad comes across an IFV or any other light-armored vehicles, it will have no trouble destroying it by launching a couple of them at the vehicle.
我认为它很有潜力。它基本上是一种小型便携式反轻型车辆和材料武器。它可以穿透 70-75 毫米的钢板。因此，如果你的小队遇到一辆步兵战车或其他轻型装甲车辆，只要向其发射几枚，就能轻松摧毁它。
This weapon is currently exported to some Middle East special operations forces and there's pictures of them being used by operators. Better than carrying around a heavy rocket launcher when you're only expected to face light vehicles and buildings.
这种武器目前出口到中东的一些特种作战部队，而且有操作员使用它们的照片。当你只需要面对轻型车辆和建筑物时，这比随身携带重型火箭筒要好得多。
Azxctr
1天前
US Army: We improve sniper accuracy at 1000m to 1 MOA. Chinese Army: We improve sniper blast radius to 10 feet
美国陆军： 我们将 1000 米处的狙击精度提高到 1 MOA。中国军队：我们将狙击手的爆炸半径提高到 10 英尺！
Helgundam
1天前
I can see this system working as an anti-sniper platform , but also as an anti-drone system working with air burst ammo.
我认为这套系统既可以作为反狙击平台，也可以作为反无人机系统与空爆弹药配合使用。
Anamoose
10小时前
imagine being pinned down by a sniper only for them to swap to their grenade sniper and hit you from behind cover
想象一下，当你被狙击手压制住时，他们却换成了手榴弹狙击手，并从掩体后面击中了你！
Wednesday.
1天前
I’ve never heard of a sniper grenade launcher, but that is the coolest thing ever and I want one right now
我从来没听说过狙击榴弹发射器，但这是最酷的东西，我现在就想要一个！
Garywheeler
1天前（修改过）
A very cool concept, wish it had some kind of dug in baseplate at the back end of the stock to take the recoil into the ground though.
非常酷的概念，但希望在枪托后端有某种挖入式底板，以吸收地面的后坐力。
Javannapoli
3小时前
There's also a little grey area with international law regarding these kinds of weapons as it is illegal to field weapons that use munitions that explode inside of a human target, and though they aren't explicitly designed to do that, these weapons technically touch on that law.From what I remember, this law was another one of the many reasons the XM25 was discontinued.
关于这类武器，国际法也有一点灰色地带，因为使用在人体目标内部爆炸的弹药的武器是非法的，虽然这些武器并没有明确设计成在人体目标内部爆炸，但从技术上讲，这些武器触犯了这一法律。在我的记忆中，这条法律是 XM25 停产的另一个原因。
PlaneReality
1天前
This is incredibly smart especially with the changes in modern warfare. Our tactics and even Russia and others use heavy armor... which its clear now is no longer effective... in fact its a total weakness. Same thing with missile tech. War has returned to lower tech personnel based fighting and this is a huge advantage as an anti personnel weapon! This is not a launcher... this is a grenade gun.
这是非常聪明的做法，尤其是在现代战争发生变化的情况下。我们的战术，甚至俄罗斯和其他国家都使用重型装甲......现在很明显，重型装甲已不再有效......事实上，这完全是一个弱点。导弹技术也是如此。战争已经回归到以人员为基础的低技术战斗，而作为反人员武器，这是一个巨大的优势！这不是发射器......这是榴弹枪。
Tamalesftw
1天前
Wow China actually made something new and unique
哇，中国居然做出了新颖独特的东西！
GraniteInTheFace
1天前
This seems interesting for urban warfare where you don't want to give away your position. Unlike a normal rpg, no smoke no trail.
对于不想暴露位置的城市战争来说，这似乎很有趣。不像普通的RPG，没有烟雾就没有踪迹。
Chuckreichert
1天前
The laser range finder programmable airburst option is just deadly if it works. And while you may say stuff like "according to China", China will not field or commission it if it didn't work. These kinds of weapons is not worth doing propaganda for. They aren't nukes or missiles or jets and aren't useful in that kind of sense for deterrence propaganda.
激光测距仪的可编程空爆选项如果能用，那简直就是致命的。虽然你可能会说 "根据中国的说法"之类的话，但如果它不起作用，中国是不会投入使用的。这类武器不值得做宣传。它们不是核武器、导弹或喷气式飞机，在威慑宣传方面没有任何作用。
Also,even mentioned that they have export versions which can use NATO and other foreign rounds. So it's not like others can't buy and test it and bust China if they are lying. That is the real test and makes it believable regardless of what china claims since it will be confirmed by independent third parties.
此外甚至提到，他们还有出口版本，可以使用北约和其他外国子弹。因此，如果中国在撒谎，其他人也不是不能购买并测试它。这才是真正的测试，无论中国声称什么，这都是可信的，因为它将得到独立第三方的证实。
Junweihe
6小时前
Looks like Chinese army hasn't yet gotten over the "lacking firepower" PTSD they got from the Korean war
看来中国军队还没有从朝鲜战争的 "火力不足"创伤后应激障碍中走出来！
Rustknucklei
1天前
This could also be useful in targeting armored vehicle external sensors, equipment and optics in situations where you don't have access to weapons that can penetrate and fully destroy the target vehicles armor.
在无法使用可穿透并完全摧毁目标车辆装甲的武器的情况下，这在瞄准装甲车辆外部传感器、设备和光学器件方面也很有用。
Guangzhoug
1小时前
Anyone familiar with PLA knows that PLA has a tradition of fear of insufficient firepower.
熟悉解放军的人都知道，解放军有怕火力不足的传统。
SachoMan
1天前
I think a smart munitions launcher in a squad is a good idea, but it think the concept is still in its infancy (despite being a concept for so long)
我认为在小队中使用智能弹药发射器是个好主意，但我认为这个概念仍处于起步阶段（尽管这个概念已经存在了很长时间）。
Talewavo
2小时前（修改过）
Imagine you have to fight against this weapon. Its so deadly because they dont have to have direct sight of line to kill someone.
想象一下，你必须与这种武器作战，这种武器非常致命，因为它们不需要直接瞄准就能杀人。
maykay.
2小时前
The whole point of a sniper is not to be detected in the first place, which sort of negates this weapons purpose. However I could see it being used as an anti-material weapon
狙击手的关键在于首先不被发现，这就等于否定了这种武器的用途。不过，我认为它可以用作反器材武器。
Waichungsham
1天前（修改过）
Drones are more versatile more deadly also battle proven to work. Can still get you when your in a trench or building or armoured vehicle
无人机的用途更广，杀伤力更大，而且经过实战验证。当你在战壕、建筑物或装甲车中时，无人机仍能击中你。
Nornje
2小时前
Useless on the normal battlefield, but extremely useful in a city environment. No room with a window is safe in a city.
在普通战场上毫无用处，但在城市环境中却非常有用。在城市里，有窗户的房间都不安全。
Zqpleo
5小时前（修改过）
It's actually a meme in China, Chinese army known to have “insufficient firepower phobia” caused by confronting US army with very underwhelming firepower during Korean war. Now they rather be over the top on firepowers
这实际上是中国的一个梗，众所周知，中国军队有“火力不足恐惧症”，这是因为在朝鲜战争期间，面对美军时火力不足。现在，他们宁愿火力过猛。
Embassy
1天前
I think with much smarter scopes, live 3D mapping of the environment, drones, AI recognition etc, programmable ammo will make a massive comeback.
我认为，随着更智能的瞄准镜、实时 3D 环境映射、无人机、人工智能识别等技术的发展，可编程弹药将大规模回归。
Firleon
3小时前
Can't imagine if they spamming these to an infantry
无法想象他们是否会在步兵中使用这些弹药？
Pelahoylaho
3小时前
It's not gonna make in real combat, because its a heavy thing in real combat it only uses light weapons so that you can still run or in any movement that your supposed to do.
这在实战中是行不通的，因为它是重型武器，在实战中它只能使用轻型武器，这样你还可以跑动或做任何你应该做的动作。
Amzarnacht
4小时前
America could re-examine this concept and come up with one accurate out to 3km if they could get a manpack scope with enough resolution at a weight a soldier could carry to identify targets at those ranges.
美国可以重新审视这一概念，如果他们能找到一种分辨率足够高、重量适合士兵携带的背负式瞄准镜，就能在 3 千米范围内精确识别目标。 |
