联合国投票赞成巴勒斯坦加入联合国,以色列驻联合国大使粉碎了联合国宪章!

245 0
卡卡西里 2024-5-13 01:31:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
今天,联合国大会以压倒性多数投票赞成巴勒斯坦申请成为正式会员国,并建议安理会重新审议此事。该动议给予巴勒斯坦人更多参加联大会议的权利,但没有常规投票权,得到了143个国家的支持。美国上个月否决了安理会的一项决议,该决议本可为此铺平道路。在今天的投票之前,以色列驻联合国大使撕毁了联合国宪章,称这正是支持巴勒斯坦加入联合国的国家正在做的事情。

联合国投票赞成巴勒斯坦加入联合国,以色列驻联合国大使粉碎了联合国宪章! ...

联合国投票赞成巴勒斯坦加入联合国,以色列驻联合国大使粉碎了联合国宪章! ...

Kevinwell
20小时前
Israel shredded the UN Charter a very long time ago!!

以色列很久以前就撕毁了《联合国宪章》!


Wulture
18小时前
perhaps israel should leave the UN then?

也许以色列应该离开联合国?(网贴翻译来自音飞网)


Albertmockel
18小时前
It's only there to try to control things

它在那里只是为了试图控制一切


KerrieRedgate
18小时前
Canada, UK, Germany and Italy abstained.France and Japan vote YES.The US is the only G7 country that opposes Palestinian statehood.

加拿大、英国、德国和意大利投弃权票。法国和日本投了赞成票,美国是 G7 国家中唯一反对巴勒斯坦建国的国家。


Chaosking
11小时前
The France and the Japanese have both surprised me.

法国人和日本人都让我大吃一惊!


Lonesome
5小时前
The United States voted against it, along with Isrel, Argentina, Czechia, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau and Papua New Guinea.That is an interesting list. I wonder what the other seven beside US and Israel gained in exchange for their NO vote.Something that benefit the country nationally ? or something that benefit the ambassador/president personally.

美国投了反对票,投反对票的还有以色列、阿根廷、捷克、匈牙利、密克罗尼西亚、瑙鲁、帕劳和巴布亚新几内亚。这份名单很有意思。我想知道,除了美国和以色列之外,其他七个国家投反对票换来了什么?是对国家有利的东西?还是对大使/总统个人有利的东西。


Marvelstark
20小时前
Singapore voted in favor as well. Despite being very close to Israel for historical reason, humanity and common sense prevails. Both Israel and Palestine people should have equal rights to exists.

新加坡也投了赞成票。尽管由于历史原因,新加坡与以色列非常接近,但人性和常识占了上风。以色列和巴勒斯坦人民都应享有平等的生存权。


edmurks2
16小时前
wont happens bc one group thinks they are the chosen ones and everyone else is animals

不会发生,因为一个群体认为他们是被选中的人,其他人都是动物!


Basfarissah
20小时前(修改过)
The United States has demonstrated to the International community that they are heavily influenced by the Israeli government.

美国已经向国际社会表明,他们深受以色列政府的影响。


Redrider
14小时前
Heavily influenced by israel aipac personal fund.

深受以色列美国以色列公共事务委员会(AIPAC)个人基金的影响。


Stevebeschakis
19小时前
Another bad day for Adolph Netanyahu.

阿道夫-内塔尼亚胡又度过了糟糕的一天。


Migzzy
20小时前(修改过)
He bought the shredder from temu

他从Ttemu(拼多多)购买了碎纸机!


Edmurks
13小时前
Made in China ? Chinese never miss a business opportunity you say?

中国制造?中国人从不放过任何商机,你说呢?


Badmawededu
20小时前
9 countries voted against are: Argentina, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Micronesia, United States, Papa New Guinea, Nauru, and Palau. These 4 namely Micronesia, Papa New Guinea, Nauru, and Palau had no choice but listen and do what they are told to do by US and Israel. Argentina has the worst government right now. Czech Republic and Hungary isolated themselves from the international community this way.

投反对票的 9 个国家是 阿根廷、捷克共和国、匈牙利、以色列、密克罗尼西亚、美国、巴布亚新几内亚、瑙鲁和帕劳。密克罗尼西亚、巴布亚新几内亚、瑙鲁和帕劳这 4 个国家别无选择,只能听从美国和以色列的命令。阿根廷拥有最糟糕的政府,捷克共和国和匈牙利就是这样将自己孤立于国际社会之外的。


Davidcooks
20小时前
So the DPRK, Myanmar, China, Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, etc. voted in favor? What's up with that?

朝鲜、缅甸、中国、伊朗、阿富汗、苏丹等国都投了赞成票?这是怎么回事?


Princealexander
20小时前
Why Hungary voted against Palestine? I don't understand? Anyone know?

为什么匈牙利投票反对巴勒斯坦?我不明白。有人知道吗?


Laithmughrabi
19小时前
they are trying the israel model for theo fascist state, just like Modi in india, and Erdogan in Trukey.maybe they get some help in return in future for such support.

或者,他们正在尝试以色列模式建立法西斯国家,就像印度的莫迪和土耳其的埃尔多安一样。也许他们的这种支持将来会换来一些帮助。


Vincentlagrange
14小时前(修改过)
So South Korea, Japan, Rwanda, South Africa, Jamaica, New Zealand, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, Ireland, France, Denmark, Iceland, etc. voted in favor? What's up with that?There are 143 countries who voted in favour to fully accept Palestine as a member state of the UN.

那么韩国、日本、卢旺达、南非、牙买加、新西兰、澳大利亚、墨西哥、巴西、爱尔兰、法国、丹麦、冰岛等国都投了赞成票?这是怎么回事?有 143 个国家投票赞成完全接受巴勒斯坦成为联合国会员国。


NormalAlien
11小时前
Him tearing the UN charter and then saying it's the others that did it is very reflective of what Israel is doing.

他撕毁联合国宪章,然后说是其他人干的,这很能反映以色列的所作所为。


Elliotjoseph
20小时前
I did not know they made a shredder that small.

我不知道还有这么小的碎纸机。


Chinavirus
20小时前
As someone living in Germany, I'm actually pleasently surprised that you abstained. Fully expected Germany to be one of the against votes...

作为一个生活在德国的人,我对你投了弃权票感到惊喜。完全预料到德国会投反对票…


Brazendesigns
20小时前(修改过)
An abstention instead of supporting Israel is a huge move for Germany and a clear rebuke of Netanyahu. Abstention means you don’t stand in the way but there are reasons why you cannot vote in support. We may not agree with it, but Germany’s historical obligation to Israel is why they could not vote in favour. The overwhelming vote for membership meant the abstention wasn’t relevant except for the message it sends Israel. It’s purely diplomatic.

弃权而不支持以色列是德国的一个重大举措,也是对内塔尼亚胡的明确斥责。弃权意味着你不阻挠,但你有理由不能投支持票。我们可能不同意,但德国对以色列的历史义务是他们不能投赞成票的原因。绝大多数国家都投了赞成票,这意味着弃权并不重要,重要的是它向以色列传递了一个信息。这纯粹是外交辞令。


Barryirlandi
18小时前
Didn't Israel tell us thier war was against Hamas not against the Palestinian people? So why is he upset Palestinians are getting some rights?

以色列不是告诉我们他们的战争是针对哈马斯而不是巴勒斯坦人民的吗?那他为什么对巴勒斯坦人获得一些权利感到不满呢?


Yawninglion
13小时前
At this point, they can very well shred the Declaration of Human Rights too.

在这一点上,他们也完全可以撕碎《人权宣言》。


Aquariumlife
17小时前(修改过)
Why is taking so long for the arrest warrant issue from the ICC towards Netanyahu?

为什么国际刑事法院对内塔尼亚胡发出逮捕令需要这么长时间?


WalesTheTrueBritons
20小时前
Palestine didn’t start the aggression, they had their land taken from them and given to someone else, the English transported them to Palestine and then the Americans supplied them with weapons in order to Establish Isreal on the corpse of Palestine. The Arab league then decided to defend them but thanks to the Americans they succeeded.

巴勒斯坦并没有发动侵略,他们的土地被别人夺走,英国人把他们运到巴勒斯坦,然后美国人向他们提供武器,以便在巴勒斯坦的尸体上建立以色列。阿拉伯联盟随后决定保卫他们,但多亏了美国人,他们才得以成功。


PartisanGamer
18小时前
PLO's Arrafat was the one who suggested two state solution in Oslo accords but Natenyahu sabotaged the agreement and till today he promises there will never be a Palestinian state or even Oslo accords

巴解组织的阿拉法特是在奥斯陆协议中提出两国解决方案的人,但内塔尼亚胡破坏了该协议,直到今天他还承诺永远不会有巴勒斯坦国,甚至不会有奥斯陆协议!


JoaoSoares
11小时前
No exist palestinian state never ! Before Is empire Ottomano (Turkey), After losing war againt UK , France and Usa , changed situation! The ancient territory of Israel come back at the original customers ! Without Rome and Bizantine Empire before and invasioni of Saladine After , state of Giudea and Galilea (Israel) have 3000 years

从来就不存在巴勒斯坦国!在奥斯曼帝国(土耳其)之前,在与英国、法国和美国的战争中失败后,情况发生了变化!古老的以色列领土回到了原来的那里!在没有罗马和拜占廷帝国之前,以及萨拉丁入侵之后,朱迪亚和加利利亚(以色列)有 3000 年的历史。


Jamespattinson
7小时前
he is right,Arab nations and Palestinians rejected 2 state solution when they have the upper hand now Israel has the upper hand

他说得对,阿拉伯国家和巴勒斯坦人在占上风时拒绝两国解决方案,现在以色列占上风了。


Truelies
13小时前
What a funny thing. Thieves have become the owner of the stolen property

真是一件有趣的事情,小偷成了赃物的主人!


Feverdreamer
18小时前
Israel has a mad ambassador. Please teach him manner

以色列有个疯狂的大使,请教教他礼仪!


Frankyu
15小时前
Someone, please remind me what happened to the last guy who shredded the United Nations Charter at the general assembly.

谁来提醒我一下,上一个在大会上撕毁《联合国宪章》的人后来怎么样了?


Cedardrive
20小时前
This is hilarious. The Israeli Ambassador to the UN literally shreds a copy of the UN Charter publicly while claiming, at the same time, that the other members of the UN are shredding the Charter.

这太搞笑了。以色列驻联合国大使在公开撕毁《联合国宪章》的同时,还声称联合国其他成员国也在撕毁《宪章》。


Wqvln
20小时前
You didnt get it. He shredded it because THEY have deemed it useless !

你没明白。他把它撕碎了,因为他们认为它没用!


Cedardrive
19小时前
Nevertheless, he shredded the Charter while accusing others of committing it. I remember, some six months ago, he exhibited at the UN assembly a brick and claimed that this brick was the weapon used by the Palestinians to attack the Israeli soldiers. However, he failed to mention that the weapons used by the Israelis to kill the Palestinians are guns, cannons, tanks, bulldozers, fighter jets, missiles and 1,000kg bombs.

尽管如此,他还是撕毁了《宪章》,同时指责其他人违反了《宪章》。我记得,大约六个月前,他在联合国大会上展示了一块砖头,并声称这块砖头是巴勒斯坦人用来袭击以色列士兵的武器。但是,他没有提到以色列人用来杀害巴勒斯坦人的武器是枪、大炮、坦克、推土机、战斗机、导弹和 1 000 公斤的炸弹。


Except for a gun, none of these weapons could have been brought into the meeting room of the UN Assembly meeting because they are too heavy and too bulky. But it was truly hilarious when he exhibited the weapon used by the Palestinians and compared it with the weapons used by the Israelis.

除了枪之外,这些武器都不可能被带进联合国大会的会议室,因为它们太重太笨重了。不过,当他展示巴勒斯坦人使用的武器,并将其与以色列人使用的武器进行比较时,确实令人捧腹。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|网站地图|渝公网安备 50019002502186号|音飞网 ( 渝ICP备2022004218号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-26 07:04 , Processed in 0.068094 second(s), 33 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2023, Tencent Cloud.