暗鼠行动--彻底改变世界的黑客行动。一切始于 2006 年，当时韩国一家建筑公司的员工收到了一封带有附件的电子邮件。这些攻击袭击了至少 71 个组织，包括国防承包商、世界各地的企业、联合国和国际奥林匹克委员会。受到攻击的政府包括加拿大、印度、韩国、美国和越南。人们普遍认为该国家行为者是中国。
美国博主：让中国成为超级大国的黑客攻击-暗鼠行动！
Wangyaohan
4天前
considering US is accepting millions of "unknown" people already, next operations can be done internally, by people from any nationality origin.
考虑到美国已经接受了数百万 "身份不明"的人，接下来的行动可以在内部进行，由来自任何国籍的人完成。
JKRowl
1天前
Actually China is correct. If the US conducts them, why shouldn't they? They are right.
其实中国是对的，既然美国都这样做了，他们为什么不能呢？他们是对的。
MygenteTV
3天前（修改过）
As a senior penetration tester and someone that had discovered more than 6 vulnerabilities on some of the USA federal agencies, the USA cybersecurity is one of the worst
作为一名资深渗透测试人员，我曾在美国一些联邦机构中发现了 6 个以上的漏洞，美国的网络安全是最糟糕的之一！
Keepskatin
2天前
Also, but most basically, cyber security needs to win every time to win. Hackers only need to win once.
另外，但最根本的是，网络安全需要每次都赢才能获胜。黑客只需要赢一次。
Sunmoon
2天前
Actually sometimes money cannot buy best brains. Extremely intelligent and brilliant people are not motivated by money, they already make a lot of money by starting their own business etc. usually they stand by their own ideology. So even if us spend 100 billion instead of 50 the results will be same.
其实，有时候金钱并不能买来最好的头脑。极其聪明和杰出的人不会为金钱所动，他们已经通过创业等方式赚了很多钱。因此，即使我们花 1000 亿而不是 500 亿，结果也是一样的。
Heeroyui
2天前
One weakness of our Neoliberal system is that the US government partners with private entities, and each one is responsible for its own security. Which if any one of them fail to do so, compromises that specific link. In a system like China's where everything is centralized, its harder to breach but if you do you have access to everything. Our system is more compartmentalized, theirs more uniform. Pros and cons of each.
我们的新自由主义体系的一个弱点是，美国政府与私营实体合作，而每个私营实体都对自己的安全负责。如果其中任何一家未能做到这一点，就会危及这一特定环节。在中国这样的系统中，一切都集中在一起，很难被攻破，但如果你攻破了，你就能接触到一切。我们的系统更分散，他们的系统更统一。各有利弊。
Amirtovar
2天前
Corporations with millions invested in their cyber-defence budget can be beaten by a single well researched teenager with a decent laptop and Internet connection.
拥有数百万网络防御预算的公司，可能会被一个拥有像样的笔记本电脑和网络连接、研究透彻的青少年打败。
DoomCycle
1天前
Greed breeds stupidity the biggest vulnerability in a system is humans
贪婪滋生愚蠢，系统中最大的漏洞是人类！
Banalresentive
2天前
Regarding F35 design theft: When I worked for Defence companies, it was standard for all classified data and software to be stored on locked-down air-gapped systems.Avoiding those DOD mandates could get you free room and board at a federal facility for several years.Have the security rules been relaxed? Have we gotten that stupid?If this was willful stupidity on the part of Lockheed Martin staff, they should VERY PUBLICLY be convicted and sent to the Big House.
关于F35设计失窃：当我在国防公司工作时，所有机密数据和软件都必须存储在锁定的空气屏蔽系统中。如果不遵守国防部的这些规定，就可能在联邦设施中获得数年的免费食宿。 安全规则放松了吗？我们有那么愚蠢吗？如果这是洛克希德-马丁公司员工故意犯下的愚蠢行为，他们应该被公开定罪并送进大牢。
Andrewsandoval
2天前
This all happened pre-Snowden before 2007 back when sub-contractors kept kicking the bucket in regards to security. When the F35 incident happened the DoD lost it's collective shit and cracked down.
这一切都发生在2007年 "斯诺登"事件之前，当时分包商在安全问题上屡屡出错。当F35事件发生后，国防部集体 "懵逼"了，并进行了严厉打击。
Stussymishka
2天前
funny to expect defense contracts who basically own our government to be held accountable
指望那些基本上拥有我们政府的国防合同商承担责任，真是可笑！
Michaelwang
1天前
TSMC's also prohibit staff from carrying mobile phones into the facility with even taking picture of the internal structure can get you removed/fired.Regulation has to be upkeep or make sure employee don't have sensitive information on their non-work related phone.I won't even mind getting employee to have 2 phones for sensitive positions such as these (one for family-friends and one for purely work)
台积电也禁止员工携带手机进入厂区，即使拍摄内部结构也会被除名或开除。我们必须加强监管，确保员工的手机里没有与工作无关的敏感信息。我甚至不介意让员工在这种敏感岗位上使用两部手机（一部给家人和朋友，一部纯粹用于工作）。
Wavydavy
3天前
Every single one of these companies could have avoided all this trouble by spending more money on security rather than just 'hoping' that the measures they had in place would be good enough.
这些公司中的每一家都可以通过在安全方面投入更多资金来避免所有这些麻烦，而不是仅仅“希望”他们所采取的措施已经足够好。
EB-qb1vl
2天前
Very ignorant comment. The age old adage rings true, if you build it, they will come. This isn't ancient China with Mongols on horseback. The threat, as was just explained to you, is persistent, and ever evolving. Cold war never ended mate.
非常无知的评论。老话说得好，只要你建好了，他们就会来。这里不是蒙古人骑着马的古代中国。正如刚刚向你解释的那样，威胁是持续存在的，而且不断演变。冷战从未结束，伙计！
Criptovida
4天前
China became smarter when they started using local technology companies. The US still has higher access to other countries as they can inject any RAT along with Windows OS which the majority of countries do use in their critical infrastructures.
当中国开始使用本地技术公司时，他们变得更加聪明了。与其他国家相比，美国仍然拥有更高的权限，因为他们可以在 Windows 操作系统中注入任何 RAT，而大多数国家都在其关键基础设施中使用 Windows 操作系统。
Krshnn
3天前
You’d be surprised to see how much “critical” infrastructures still use windows.
你会惊讶地发现，有多少 "关键"基础设施仍在使用 windows。
Factsoverfeelings
3天前
Some critical infrastructures still use windows xp and have not been shut down since 2002...this was in 2018 when I was enlisted in the USAF. They're so critical that they cannot be shut down for even one minute for an update and have generators for generators. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
一些关键基础设施仍在使用 Windows xp，而且自 2002 年以来从未关闭过......这是我在美国空军入伍时的 2018 年。它们是如此重要，以至于不能因为更新而关闭哪怕一分钟，而且还有发电机。如果没坏就不要修。
Nazmdar
2天前
This is exactly what US has done to Iran by developing Stuxnet worm. It was one of the most sophisticated attacks to the control system of an industrial plant.
这正是美国通过开发 Stuxnet 蠕虫病毒对伊朗所做的事情。这是对工业工厂控制系统最复杂的攻击之一。
Hdogdizzy
4天前
Moral of the story, never ever use Windows OS for the work!
这个故事的寓意是：永远不要用 Windows 操作系统来工作！
Nbbdjwbdbhe
4天前
is it really hard to hack a device nowadays, but once the the user downloads whatever you told them to, it is 99.99% game over for user's device. Just do not download what looks suspicious. Period.
现在要黑进一个设备真的很难，但一旦用户下载了你让他们下载的任何东西，用户的设备就 99.99% 完蛋了。只要不下载看起来可疑的东西。就这样！
Blakemoresimon
4天前
No matter how perfect the protection is there will always be 1 weak link, Humans we are and always will be the weak link.
无论保护措施多么完善，总会有一个薄弱环节，而我们人类现在和将来都是薄弱环节。
Aaraviii
3天前
Reminding you that most of devices used today has built-in (hardware & software based) backdoors which requires no user interaction whatsoever to "have access" /hack your device for the one with the knowledge.
提醒您，当今使用的大多数设备都有内置（基于硬件和软件的）后门，用户无需进行任何交互，就能 "访问"/黑进你的设备。
CanadianFitted
3天前（修改过）
brother Been trying to tell people about this for years , the Chinese are also hyper focused on a quantum computer, pouring more resources and money into the project than anyone else. You could probably speculate the implications of that more than I could but it’s not great
兄弟！多年来我一直想告诉大家，中国人也非常关注量子计算机，在这个项目上投入的资源和资金比任何人都多。你可能比我更能推测出其中的含义，但这并不是什么好事。
Kylorenkardas
3天前
they already have it, it's called Jiuzhang1 & Jiuzhang2.their quantum computer is different than ours, they use lasers & mirrors, it's a double slit delayed choice setup on steroids
他们已经有了，叫九章 1 号和九章 2 号。他们的量子计算机与我们的不同，他们使用激光和反射镜，是一种双缝延迟选择设置。
Borrago
2天前
They are also dumping loads into quantum coms....which will be even more devastating when ww3(which we are already in) goes fully kenetic.
他们还将大量资金投入到量子通信....当第三次世界大战（我们已经身处其中）全面爆发时，这将更具破坏性。
Smokinjoe
2天前
We do not have to put our infrastructure on the net to begin with.Seems to be a security risk easily explored.Why risk National Security for convenience?!?
我们没有必要把我们的基础设施放在网络上，这似乎是一个很容易被发现的安全隐患。为什么要为了方便而冒国家安全的风险呢？
Bradleydevoir
3天前
the problem is that we DO do everything better, especially innovation and military technology. So yes, other countries being able to steal American ideas that took many years and tons of money to develop is bad
问题是，我们在所有方面都做得更好，尤其是创新和军事技术。所以是的，其他国家能够窃取美国花了多年时间和大量资金才开发出来的创意是很糟糕的。
Thelonewrangler
4天前
I cant help but be slightly concerned for the future when the US education sytem is failing in so many ways
国的教育系统在很多方面都失败了，我不禁对未来略感担忧。
Kentershackle
2天前（修改过）
Ya should be panicking...They are producing 1.2 million degree + 75k STEM PhD grads per year.. Meanwhile the US is making gender studies PHD
你应该感到恐慌......他们每年生产120万个学位和 7.5 万个理工科类博士毕业生......与此同时，美国正在把性别研究列为博士学位！
PleaseGetReal
1天前
And Ph D in African studies !Australia is also doing a lot of research on Aboriginal studies. Now the first few units of a bachelor degree in Australia has to teach something about the abos !
还有非洲研究的博士！澳大利亚也在大力开展原住民研究。现在，澳大利亚学士学位的前几个单元都必须教授一些有关原住民的知识！
Matthewexline
1天前
Roman proverb: "Opportunity makes the thief.".As long as America continues to blame other countries for it's own shortcomings progress won't come.Face facts: You're responsible for your own vulnerabilities.
罗马谚语："机会造就小偷"。只要美国继续把自己的缺点归咎于其他国家，就不会有进步。面对现实吧：你要为自己的弱点负责。
Zgameplay
2天前
Yea, listening to ur videos while whamming, the US must be so stupid till everyoneone can intercept then accuse someone stole it
是啊，一边听着你的视频，一边捶胸顿足，美国一定是太蠢了，直到每个人都能偷窃，然后指责别人偷了它！
Richardhoo
1天前
they aren’t that smart, we’re just that stupid.
他们没那么聪明，只是我们太笨了！
Lancesay
3天前
to me, its amazing when chinese hackers, most if not all barely could speak great english and yet their hacking skills are crazy. you have to know english really well, then the programming languages... that is like knowing three or more just computer languages, plus english and chinese. i cant even walk and chew gum, without biting my cheek and lips.
在我看来，中国黑客即使不是全部，也是大多数几乎不会说流利的英语，但他们的黑客技术却令人惊叹。你必须非常熟悉英语，然后是编程语言......这就好比会三种或更多的计算机语言，再加上英语和中文。
DwigtRortugal
2天前
Sadly, in a lot of cases the hacking skills don't have to be impressive because the targets are so soft and security is so lax.
可悲的是，在很多情况下，黑客技术并不需要多么高超，因为目标太软弱，安全措施太松懈。
Aleksandarjokic
4天前
the americans have been doing it for decades, they taught them to do it. what are you wondering now
美国人已经这样做了几十年，是他们教他们这样做的。你现在想知道什么？
Sparkybob
2天前
Joke aside, I don't see how this operation made China a superpower - the video goes a long way to explain the operation, but not to explain its economic effects and how they played out, besides 2 points in the video where it makes use of correlation and many asumptions but just leaving more questions unanswered: how has this operation played out to make China a superpower?
撇开玩笑不谈，我看不出这次行动是如何让中国成为超级大国的--视频花了很大篇幅来解释这次行动，但却没有解释其经济效应及其如何产生的，除了视频中的两点，它还利用了相关性和许多假设，但却留下了更多的问题：这次行动是如何让中国成为超级大国的？
I'm sure the data stolen played a role in a multitude of factors, but I highly doubt its effect was proportionally significant. Not only is China a vastly different country, with its own history, economic status and system (therefore requiring customized policies and can't be reliant on someone else's specific data), but data has been stolen before and it didn't boom other countries into superpower status
我确信被窃取的数据在众多因素中发挥了作用，但我非常怀疑其影响是否成正比。中国不仅是一个完全不同的国家，有自己的历史、经济状况和制度（因此需要定制化的政策，不能依赖别人的特定数据），而且数据以前也被盗过，但并没有让其他国家崛起为超级大国。
Manchagojo
2天前
Its called click bait buddy.. Welcome to the internet..
这叫点击诱饵，伙计…欢迎来到互联网… |
