在这段视频中,我们将探究由美国国防部高级研究计划局(DARPA)和诺斯鲁普-格鲁曼公司(Northrup Grumman)共同开发的革命性无人潜航器(UUV)“蝠鲼”(Manta Ray)｡与传统潜艇不同的是,蝠鲼可以自主运行､悄无声息地潜行,并能通过收集海洋能量几乎无限期地潜入水下｡其模块化设计便于组装和部署,使其成为改变美国海军游戏规则的利器｡随着中国加快潜艇生产,蝠鲼可能会改变海军力量的平衡｡深入了解这项尖端技术的工作原理!
美国新型 “蝠鲼”潜艇为何令中国闻风丧胆?
StrikeBuster
21小时前
Imagine hundreds of drones sitting on the sea floor near enemy territory. Just waiting for order 66.
想象一下,数百架无人机停在敌方领土附近的海底｡只等 66 号令｡
ChrisatHome
14小时前(修改过)
It used to be every submarine that is moving through the water had unique frequencies. I am sure this is still the case and there is onboard database to know who the enemy is. I remember going on a detachment where they gathered this data on a new USSR submarine 50 years ago.
过去,每艘在水中航行的潜艇都有独特的频率｡我相信现在仍然如此,而且艇上有数据库可以知道谁是敌人｡我记得 50 年前,他们曾参加过一个分遣队,在那里收集了苏联新潜艇上的这些数据｡
Saywordtv
20小时前
If we know about it, there are more things they don't show us!
如果我们知道了,他们还有更多的东西没有给我们看!
Covercalls
20小时前
True, while we are looking at A, B and C is going on.
没错,当我们在看 A 的时候,B 和 C 正在进行｡
Chriswho
17小时前
this is like 2008 theory: EV car charging stations but underwater, electric cars with more acceleration and performance than traditional ICE. it's crazy to think the ocean, one of the last unknowns on this planet, might be getting fully mapped rn by the US military. these drones have depth limits limited only by seals, etc. and not air pockets.
这就像2008年的理论:电动汽车充电站但在水下,电动汽车比传统的内燃机有更多的加速和性能｡海洋是地球上最后的未知领域之一,美国军方可能会对其进行全面测绘,这真是太疯狂了｡这些无人机的深度限制只受密封件等的限制,而不受气囊的限制｡
Xanaphiato
6小时前
This technology has been public for years. The Chinese version of the Manta Ray drone was already in the ocean three years ago, and here are a bunch of people who think the Chinese are trembling with what they already have, LOL. You can even search for many Chinese versions of the video on YTB
这项技术已经公开多年了｡中国版的“蝠鲼”无人机三年前就已经在海洋里了,这里有一群人认为中国人正在为他们已经拥有的东西而颤抖,哈哈｡你甚至可以在油管上搜索到许多中文版本的视频!
ChuckyRed
20小时前(修改过)
China: "WRITE THAT DOWN,WRITE THAT DOWN" ️
中国:“记下来,记下来”!️
Xanaphiato
6小时前
Why would they write down something they already have? In fact, China already had similar weapons two or three years ago, and you can search for similar videos on ytb. I really can’t tell who actually plagiarized it.
他们为什么要“记下来”,他们已经拥有的东西?事实上,两三年前中国就已经有了类似的武器,你可以在油管上搜索类似的视频｡我真不知道到底是谁剽窃了它｡
Beatstreet
20小时前
China is a paper tiger and in most simulations is defeated.
中国是一只纸老虎,在大多数模拟中都被打败了｡
JohnCox
49分钟前
This has been superceeded by the DT31. These are unmanned Chinese deep water submersibles which were first deployed 200 nautical miles west of California in May 2017. They are permanent armed vessels with the capacity to launch ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads up to 1800km.
它已被 DT31 取代｡这是中国的无人深水潜水器,于 2017 年 5 月首次部署在加利福尼亚以西 200 海里处｡它们是永久性武装船只,有能力发射携带核弹头的弹道导弹,射程可达 1800 公里｡
Nzriot
8小时前
Sea drones basically, and charged by moorings in the sea. Capable of going deeper than any manned submarine to avoid detection.The challenge will be how long they can actually last under the sea before they begin to need maintenance.I like how they are even shaped like a manta ray.
基本上是海上无人机,通过系泊在海里充电｡它们能比任何载人潜艇潜得更深,以避免被探测到｡挑战在于,在开始需要维护之前,它们究竟能在海底持续多长时间｡我喜欢它们的形状,甚至像鳐鱼｡
Tunejunky
17小时前
this also doesn't quite "get" the true versatility of having "payload capability". while it's very true the Manta Ray could be used as an attritable, the value is in the remorseless application of surveillance. this payload ability may be more likely used by carrying a brace of torpedoes where the cost of the Manta Ray isn't far off that of the cost of those torpedoes. where even a diesel/electric sub costs well over 10x more.
这也没有完全“得到”拥有“有效载荷能力”的真正多功能性｡虽然蝠鲼确实可以作为一种属性,但它的价值在于无情的监视应用｡这种有效载荷能力可能更有可能被用于携带一对鱼雷,而“蝠鲼”的成本与那些鱼雷的成本相差不远｡即使是柴油/电动潜艇的成本也要高出10倍以上｡
imho, this is way better than the old school of mining the waters and hope you get a military vessel. this baby can contain the weapon until needed.
我的意思是,这比在水域采矿的老学校好多了,希望你能得到一艘军舰｡这个孩子可以在需要的时候携带武器｡
Chezsnailez
19小时前
What if one of these get caught in a fishing net?
如果其中一个被渔网网住了怎么办?
Clivestainles
18小时前
The classic problem ... the other is if it comes up and gets hit by a fast moving boat probably a sailboat .. possibly doing 20knots or more.
这是一个典型的问题......另一个问题是,如果它被一艘快速行驶的船撞上,可能是帆船......速度可能达到 20 节或更快｡
Seelow
16小时前
It's hydrodynamic not aerodynamic
是流体力学而非空气动力学!
Mrmaxb
16小时前
China will be trying to hack this technology from the US!
中国将试图从美国窃取这项技术!
AndyM
5小时前
Man, the Chinese version of the Manta Ray unmanned underwater vehicle has been in the sea for several years
老兄,中国版的“蝠鲼”无人潜航器已经在海中工作了好几年了!
Williamc
18小时前
I got to see it I live close to it ..-an they tested it at the public beach it’s pretty cool
我得去看看,我住得很近｡他们在公共海滩做了测试,非常酷!
Gringogreen
16小时前
It looks more like an A Wing fighter in Star Wars.
它看起来更像《星球大战》中的 A 翼战斗机!
Timeliebe
15小时前
So who plugs in and unplugs the Manta Ray when it needs to recharge its batteries?
那么,当蝠鲼需要充电的时候,是谁给它插上又拔掉电源呢?
Grunkor
5小时前
its solar, it scans area to make sure its safe, then it surfaces long enough to charge. This and they have wireless charging pods underwater spread around near bases
它是太阳能的,它会扫描区域以确保安全,然后浮出水面足够长的时间来充电｡在基地附近的水下也有无线充电舱｡
Daculaboy
1小时前
The video literally says it is charged by the change is ocean temperature and literally doesn't have to resurface.
视频中的字面意思是,它是通过海洋温度的变化来充电的,根本不需要浮出水面｡
Mariomaniac
1小时前
The drone does, assuming the plug is on the back of the drone, for example, it could simply back into the charging station and plug itself in.
无人机可以,比如说,假设插头在无人机的背面,它就可以直接回到充电站,然后自己插上电源｡
Tonyklymson
17小时前
If it gets caught in net , sell it as tuna
如果被网住,就当金枪鱼卖掉!
Arbelico
2小时前
Perhaps the US should consider designing and producing a "cheap" conventional submarine for its allies and thus generate some numerical strength in the area.
也许美国应该考虑为其盟国设计和生产一种 “廉价 ”的常规潜艇,从而在该地区形成一定的数量优势｡
OmarCastro
18小时前
How much damage to aquatic life damage is predicted?
预测对水生生物的损害有多大?
Clivestainles
17小时前(修改过)
Very little they don't move that quick and like the deep sea creatures they are modelled on lack sharp edges. The props fold when not in use.In open deep water can probably gravity glide by sinking and rising in the water column like the earlier Shark USVs in use by several nations.
它们非常小,移动速度不快,而且就像它们所模仿的深海生物一样,没有锋利的边缘｡翼不用时可以折叠｡在开阔的深水中,它们可能会像一些国家使用的早期 “鲨鱼”型 USV 一样,通过在水体中下沉和上升来实现重力滑行｡
Getting tangled in ghost nets or if they ever surface hit by faster or large boats might be a problem.. private ocean crossing sailing vessels have hit the SHARK sea glider type as they surface to communicate collected data via satellites especially at night or in slightly rough water.
如果被鬼网缠住,或者在浮出水面时被速度更快或更大的船只撞到,可能会有问题｡私人远洋帆船在浮出水面通过卫星通信收集到的数据时,尤其是在夜间或稍有风浪的水域,就会撞到 “鲨鱼”海上滑翔机｡
Stevenschwar
6小时前
China had similar Manta Ray bionic weapons two or three years ago, and you can find a lot of related news
两三年前,中国也有过类似的蝠鲼仿生武器,你可以找到很多相关新闻!
Madjeepernh
12小时前
The funny thing is...this is already ten year old tech....
有趣的是......这已经是十年前的技术了....
DxBlack
6小时前
The funny thing is, the Chinese are still building 50 year old steam-powered ships...so what's your point?
有趣的是,中国人仍在建造 50 年前的蒸汽动力船......那你想说什么?
Grunkor
5小时前
Anything DARPA puts out, like this sub, are 15-20 yrs old
国防部高级研究计划局推出的任何产品,比如这艘潜艇,都是 15-20 年前的产品了｡
Jpdi2715
3小时前
The USA funds an incredible lot of innovation-R&D with DARPA money. The results of such research generally are under embargo (AKA secret, not commercially tradeable) for 30 years (AFAIK).
美国用国防部高级研究计划局的资金资助了大量的创新研发活动｡这些研究成果通常会被封锁(又称机密,不可进行商业贸易)30 年(我认为)｡
If you look at Japan's post-1950s economic growth being faster than "The West", then you can completely explain this by (1) them not having this "problem" and (2) by not having any expenditure on military.Or, in many cases "new technology" in the consumer market may already be 30 years old.
如果你看看日本在 20 世纪 50 年代后的经济增长快于 “西方”,那么你完全可以用以下两个原因来解释 1)他们没有这个 “问题”;(2)他们没有任何军事开支｡或者,在许多情况下,消费市场上的 “新技术”可能已经有 30 年的历史了｡
Manuelteixeira
19小时前
Drones and A.I. is the present trend in warfare.
无人机和人工智能是当前战争的趋势｡
TheRezro
3小时前
Well... US don't use diesel powered submarines, so they also would not surface during combat operations. Only occasionally need move to port for resupply. As such Chinese anti-sub strategy would be useless anyway.It is more against diesel submarines of other nations in the area.
嗯... 美国不使用柴油动力潜艇,因此它们也不会在作战行动中浮出水面｡只是偶尔需要靠港补给｡因此,无论如何,中国的反潜战略都是无用的｡它更多的是针对该地区其他国家的柴油潜艇｡
Darkestwilig
12小时前
Star wars? Pfft it looks more like a Star Trek shuttle, especially the delta flyer flattened and with less detail
星球大战吗?但它看起来更像《星际迷航》中的穿梭机,尤其是三角洲飞行器被压扁了,细节更少了!
Okarab
14小时前
Why are we informing our enemies what we have?
我们为什么要把掌握的信息告诉敌人?
TeachinTV
20小时前
I'm glad that the designers of this most revolutionary underwater craft are smarter than the people who write for this film maker.
我很高兴,这种最具革命性的水下飞行器的设计者比那些为电影制作人撰稿的人更聪明｡ |
