米尔斯海默教授警告乌克兰和中东冲突的灾难性后果!

176 0
卡卡西里 2024-7-5 17:00:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
在这段视频中,著名国际关系学者约翰·米尔斯海默教授讨论了北约在乌克兰的行动和升级、核冲突的风险、以色列游说团的影响、与真主党、伊朗和俄罗斯的潜在战争、加沙战争的结果、美国大选结果的影响以及拜登和特朗普的外交政策。

米尔斯海默教授警告乌克兰和中东冲突的灾难性后果!

米尔斯海默教授警告乌克兰和中东冲突的灾难性后果!

Danielmcleod
1天前
"The goal is NOT to win these wars. The goal is to use the wars to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States and out of the tax bases of European countries and back into the hands of a transnational security elite. THAT is the goal. To have ENDLESS wars, NOT SUCCESSFUL wars." ~ Julian Ass.ange - Stop the War Interview - 8 October 2011

"目标不是赢得这些战争。其目的是利用战争将钱从美国和欧洲国家的税基中洗出,重新回到跨国安全精英的手中。这就是目的。无休止的战争,而不是成功的战争"。~ 朱利安-阿桑奇--停止战争。采访 - 2011 年 10 月 8 日。


Kieranramtohal
1天前
Actually it’s that but also an empire and power thing the west will not let the east be as powerful or more powerful Unfortunately that’s where we are right now The west won’t go away quietly so war seems inevitable

事实上,这也是一个帝国和权力的问题,西方不会让东方变得同样强大或更加强大。不幸的是,这就是我们现在的处境。西方不会就此罢休,因此战争似乎不可避免。


Henlirwdw
19小时前
agreed.it's not a conspiracy, it's merely a system where special interest have the tools to advance their agenda, which leads to the wealth transfer.A conspiracy is something hidden. This is an open transfer.

这不是阴谋,这只是一种制度,在这种制度下,特殊利益集团拥有推进其议程的工具,从而导致财富转移。阴谋是隐藏的,这是公开的转移。


Patrickshanghai
10小时前
yes the goal is to keep the wars going. but it's not the "elites" that want it. it's the weapons merchants. Afghanistan and Iraq looked bad for the US military. but it's not because it's weak. it's extremely strong. decades ahead of any other military. it looked bad because the military was put in situations that could not be won. just to sell weapons and make the career of some generals. it's always been a problem with too strong a military. it's hard to resist using it...

是的,目的是让战争继续下去。但这不是 "精英"们想要的,而是武器商人们想要的。阿富汗和伊拉克战争对美军来说很不利,但这并不是因为美军很弱,而是因为美军非常强大,比其他任何军队都要强大数十年。美军之所以看起来很糟糕,是因为美军被置于无法取胜的境地,而这只是为了出售武器,让一些将军的职业生涯更上一层楼。


Perceived
1天前
Instead of arming Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness etc.

美国纳税人的钱应该用在基础设施、医疗保健、教育、无家可归者等方面,而不是武装乌克兰、以色列和台湾。


Zulukafr
3小时前
Do it and within a few years you will have much worse situation. The problem is not in the moneymoney , but in its internal distribution inside US and inequal distrbution of wealth.

这样做,不出几年,情况就会变得更糟。问题不在于货币,而在于它在美国国内的分配和财富的不平等分配。


Arlieferguson
3小时前
A lot of people seem to have this misconception that we are simply “giving“ money to Ukraine, which isn’t the case at all. What we’re doing is purchasing arms for Ukraine from our own domestic production lines. In other words, it is actually a way to invest in the United States and its economy.

很多人似乎误以为我们只是在向乌克兰 "捐钱",但事实并非如此。我们所做的是从我们国内的生产线上为乌克兰购买武器。换句话说,这实际上是对美国及其经济进行投资的一种方式。


REALITY
1天前
NATO is not a defensive alliance. They illegally bombed Yugoslavia (direct violation of the UN Charter). We must never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria etc.

北约不是一个防御性联盟。他们非法轰炸了南斯拉夫(直接违反了《联合国宪章》)。我们决不能忘记他们对利比亚、阿富汗、伊拉克、叙利亚等国的所作所为。


KaiWatson
1天前(修改过)
Dude maybe you should learn a little history will you? First of all NATO did not bomb Yogoslavia yes there was USA, UK etc.. countries that bombed them but there was a vote on  UN security counsol ( where the Russian federation by the way is permanent member but could not use veto since they would admid to be direct involved if they would have done so) that some one need to involve to the fact that Yogoslav Serbs where commiting genocide to Yogoslavian Albans by the support of Russia. And Serbia, Kosovo peackeeping mission was given the NATO mandate after the bombing not before that so that was never NATO mission to intervane the genocide that Serbs where commiting on the support of Russia.

老兄,也许你该学点历史知识。首先,北约没有轰炸南斯拉夫,是美国、英国等国家轰炸了他们,但联合国安理会进行了投票(顺便说一下,俄罗斯联邦是常任理事国,但不能使用否决权,因为如果他们这样做的话,他们就会承认自己直接参与其中),一些人需要参与到南斯拉夫塞尔维亚人在俄罗斯的支持下对南斯拉夫阿尔巴人实施种族灭绝的事实中。而塞尔维亚、科索沃维持和平特派团是在轰炸之后而不是之前被授予北约任务的,因此北约从未执行过干预塞尔维亚人在俄罗斯支持下实施种族灭绝的任务。


Blanka
1天前
During the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, NATO bombed the Chinese embassy, television station, passenger train and many other civilian targets. NATO used a large amount of depleted uranium munitions in Iraq and Yugoslavia. DU caused a sharp increase in the incidence of cancer and also caused birth defects in many children.

在北约轰炸南斯拉夫期间,北约轰炸了中国大使馆、电视台、客运列车等许多民用目标。北约在伊拉克和南斯拉夫使用了大量的贫铀弹药。贫铀导致癌症发病率急剧上升,也导致许多儿童出生缺陷。


Marttimattila
1天前
Putin does not consider Ukraine to be a real country and he does not want Ukrainian language and culture to exist. He wants russian empire back and it would be impossible without Ukraine as a part of it.

普京并不认为乌克兰是一个真正的国家,他也不希望乌克兰的语言和文化存在。他希望恢复俄罗斯帝国,而没有乌克兰作为帝国的一部分是不可能的。


Ospehu
1天前
Well as a Finnish i am quite avear of it. And that is the one of reasons that Finnish stans behind Ukraine. In 1994 when Ukraine give up the Soviet nukes to Russia. Russian federation signed the contract with Ukraine that they would respect Ukraines sovergnety as well.

作为芬兰人,我对此深有体会。这也是芬兰人支持乌克兰的原因之一。1994 年,乌克兰向俄罗斯交出了苏联的核武器。俄罗斯联邦与乌克兰签署了一份合约,表示他们也将尊重乌克兰的主权。


But useally the worth of signed agreaments tend to weigh just as much when toilet paper is flushed down the toilet. And that is also the reason Finland has been prepairing when Russia invades not if they invade past 80 years. And that is also reason why we have over 50 000 nuclear fall out shelters carwed over 25 meters deep in bedrock.

但实际上,当卫生纸被冲进马桶时,所签署的协议的价值也会变得一样沉重。这也是芬兰在过去 80 年里一直在为俄罗斯入侵做准备,而不是在他们入侵时做准备的原因。这也是我们在25米深的基岩中建造了5万多个核掩体的原因。


Stevotrajkovic
1天前
Russia never wanted this war. But the USA certainly did.

俄罗斯从未想要这场战争,但美国肯定想要。


Rogerblair
1天前
So why did Russia invade?

那俄罗斯为什么要入侵?


Johnmaisonneuve
1天前
yes, the eastern part, the Dunbass area (almost 90% Russian speaking). It’s the US pushing Ukraine, pushing the former TV comedian, who had initially said publically Ukraine would not join a 55 country military alliance. There is so much not being reported, like the US’s desire to defeat Russia and split the country into 4 or 5 smaller States. Obviously that’s not going to be acceptable.

是的,东部地区,顿巴斯地区(几乎 90% 讲俄语)。这是美国在逼迫乌克兰,逼迫这位最初公开表示乌克兰不会加入 55 国军事联盟的前电视喜剧演员。还有很多事情没有报道出来,比如美国希望打败俄罗斯,将该国分裂成 4 或 5 个小国。显然,这是不可能被接受的。


Konforovich
1天前
USA did provocations, but RF's decision to invade was Putin's own decision, it was unjustifiable and a stupid one as well. NATO did encroach on the borders, but it would never dare in invade RF or even have a reason to in the first place, and even if USA ever wanted to try, EU would never want it.

美国确实进行了挑衅,但俄罗斯联邦的入侵是普京自己的决定,这是毫无道理的,也是愚蠢的。北约确实侵犯了边界,但它永远不敢入侵俄罗斯联邦,甚至一开始就没有入侵的理由。


USA's actions always were very aggressive and selfish, but RF had not a lesser problem of never having a functioning negotiable democratic government, basically having a mafia government instead.

美国的所作所为总是非常具有侵略性且自私自利,但俄罗斯联邦的问题也不小,那就是它从未有过一个正常运作、可协商的民主政府,而基本上是一个黑手党政府。


Chrisman
1天前
Well they have over 500k casualties by now and more to come so keep it going the war they did not want

好吧,他们现在已经有超过50万的伤亡了,而且还会有更多的伤亡,所以继续这场他们不想要的战争!


Peerpaulin
1天前
Over the last 30 years the US worked on getting Russia into a war. This is the historical truth and can be realized by anybody who is interested in learning geopolitics and who is not victim to his own bias but looking for the truth.

在过去的 30 年里,美国一直致力于让俄罗斯卷入战争。这是历史的真相,任何有志于学习地缘政治、不受自身偏见的影响而追求真理的人都可以认识到这一点。


Blanka
9小时前
Nato does not push any country to join. Counties near Russia ask for it with their own free will just because Russia is a terrible neighbor so they want to be secured. Stop blaming a victim for caliing the police. Nobody forced Putin to invade. It was his sick choice. Every bully feels provoked.

北约不会强迫任何国家加入。俄罗斯附近的国家自愿要求加入,只是因为俄罗斯是个可怕的邻居,所以他们希望得到安全保障。不要再责怪受害者报警了。没有人强迫普京入侵。这是他病态的选择。每个恶霸都会觉得自己受到了挑衅。


Peerpaulin
3小时前
No. After Ukraine was to join the NATO Russia would have lost it's safety zone. Everybody who was involved in geopolitics knew that this could not be accepted by the Russians. It's quite naive to ignore that circumstance.

不,乌克兰加入北约后,俄罗斯就失去了安全区。每个参与地缘政治的人都知道,俄罗斯人不会接受这一点。忽视这种情况是非常幼稚的。


Ninovelez
2小时前
The US deliberately and against all warnings pushed to cross the red line with intending to make Ukrainea NATO member. After NATO has expanded towards Russia over the years and Russia had to learn that it has been betrayed with promises that NATO would not expand into the east, it would have lost it last safety zone between it and it's enemy.Russia could not accept this and had to act. It only takes basic skills for realizing these simple circumstances.

美国不顾所有警告,故意越过红线,意图使乌克兰成为北约成员国。多年来,北约一直向俄罗斯扩张,俄罗斯不得不认识到,北约不会向东部扩张的承诺是对它的背叛,它将失去与敌人之间最后的安全区。俄罗斯无法接受这一点,必须采取行动。认识到这些简单的情况只需要基本的技能。


Xuyizhen
1天前
Trump is sufficient, he wouldn’t have let these wars start in the first place

特朗普就足够了,他一开始就不会让这些战争爆发!


Ninovelez
1天前
Ukraine war remains me Iraq invasion by US under false justification, Russia at least has a point in not wanting the encirclement by NATO (US) on its borders.Few people comment or know about the origin or cause of Russia invasion, which is the continued encirclement of Russia by NATO (US) on ex USSR republics.

乌克兰战争仍然是美国以虚假理由入侵伊拉克,俄罗斯至少有理由不希望北约(美国)在其边境进行包围。很少有人评论或了解俄罗斯入侵的起源或原因,即北约(美国)对前苏联加盟共和国的持续包围。


How people expect for Russia not to defend its border from the continuous encroaching of US? What would US do in a hypothetical situation in which Russia or China start building bases on its borders? Remember the Cuban missile crisis?

人们如何指望俄罗斯不保卫自己的边境不受美国的持续侵扰?如果假设俄罗斯或中国开始在其边境建设基地,美国会怎么做?还记得古巴导弹危机吗?


Winstonskafte
1天前
If the Russian SMO was anything like Iraq war there would have been 100 000 civilian casulties by the end of 1st week .

如果俄罗斯的SMO(特别军事行动)与伊拉克战争一样,那么第一周结束时就会有10万平民死亡。


Africanchild
1天前
Ukraine, Gaza, Somalia, Vietnam, Iraq... America is always on the wrong side of history.It creates all the wars

乌克兰、加沙、索马里、越南、伊拉克...... 美国总是站在历史的错误一边,它制造了所有战争。


Katrinweigel
1天前(修改过)
Not to mention all the regime changes like Lybia, Chile, Nicaragua, Kongo, Ukraine, Iran- to just name a few…

更不用说所有的政权更迭,如利比亚、智利、尼加拉瓜、金刚、乌克兰、伊朗--仅举几例......


Ortforshort
1天前
The interesting thing is that, in the long run, the US has lost every single war it has waged since WWII. And, the fact that we have lost all of these wars and nothing has changed means that none of those wars should have been fought in the first place.

有趣的是,从长远来看,美国输掉了二战以来的每一场战争。事实上,我们输掉了所有这些战争,一切都没有改变,这意味着这些战争一开始就不应该发生。


If you fight a war and suffer no consequences, then why was the war fought in the first place? Well, obviously and cynically, some people made a ton of money off of each of these wars and continue to do so.

如果你打了一场没有后果的战争,那么为什么要打这场战争呢?显然,有些人从每一场战争中赚了很多钱,而且还在继续这样做。


The regime change coups, in most part, were made to secure US corporate dominance where it was being challenged by the local leader. And those coups were, for the most part, successful in doing that. Of course, the stated objective of all of those coups was never to maintain US corporations ripping off and fleecing the locals out of their natural resources. It was also some nonsensical excuse that never mattered whether the nonsense excuse was mitigated or not.

在很大程度上,这些政权更迭政变是为了确保美国企业的主导地位,而美国企业的主导地位正受到当地领导人的挑战。这些政变在很大程度上成功地做到了这一点。当然,所有这些政变的既定目标从来都不是让美国企业继续掠夺当地人的自然资源。这也是一些荒谬的借口,不管这些荒谬的借口是否被减轻了。


Africanchild
1天前
True...but most Americans still insist they are invincible. Even though the US keeps losing.

没错......但大多数美国人仍然坚持认为自己是不可战胜的,尽管美国一直在输。


Fleezblarp
1天前
I've got a sneaking suspicion that extensive privatization in the american military apparatus and transparent corruption may have been contributing factors in intentionally escalating to war with Russia. Normally attaching a capitalist to anything just makes it better(for the rich) like healthcare and education, by cutting the quality of the service being offered, making it more expensive and ensuring that it's understaffed and that the staff are over worked. But with the military, they make so much money that they can not only can they easily get away with gratuitous price gouging on planes that can't fly, but also they have enough money to swing elections and write foreign policy.

我隐隐怀疑,美国军事机构的广泛私有化和透明的腐败可能是故意将与俄罗斯的战争升级的促成因素。通常情况下,将资本主义附着在任何事物上只会使其变得更好(对富人而言),比如医疗和教育,方法是降低服务质量,使其更加昂贵,并确保人手不足和员工超负荷工作。但对于军方来说,他们赚得盆满钵满,不仅可以轻易摆脱在不能飞的飞机上无端抬价的行为,而且还有足够的钱来左右选举和制定外交政策。


Francisraven
20小时前
The Americans are interested in the mineral resources in Ukraine,because the US decision to cut trade with China means a massive cut in the Chinses export of rare earth minerals, to the US . By making Ukraine for ever in debt to the US, the US gain access not only to the massive grain reserves, but un interupted access to these limited materials.

美国人对乌克兰的矿产资源很感兴趣,因为美国决定削减与中国的贸易,这意味着中国对美国的稀土矿出口将大幅减少。通过让乌克兰永远欠美国的债,美国不仅可以获得大量的粮食储备,还可以不间断地获得这些有限的物资。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|网站地图|渝公网安备 50019002502186号|音飞网 ( 渝ICP备2022004218号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-7-14 15:55 , Processed in 0.072102 second(s), 33 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

Copyright © 2001-2023, Tencent Cloud.